Below is a map of the Upland South. Consisting of the greater area surrounding Appalachia and the Ozarks, it is bordered to the north by the Rust Belt, to the south by the Deep South and Sun Belt, the Great Plains to the West, and the Tidewater Region and the Southern Eastern Seaboard coastal plains.



The above map shows areas which have voted more Republican since 2004. Lest we assume this is a hotbed of virulent right wing politics, I recommend you watch "Harlan County, U.S.A.". The film is about a coal miner strike in the the southeastern most county of Kentucky, one of the darkest red in voting less for Obama than they did Kerry as shown in the above map and also darkest in the below map of poverty. Starting with RFK, politicians on "poverty tours" always include Eastern Kentucky on their map, it was mimicked by John Edwards in 2007 with substantially less public interest. In 1976 it went 60% for Jimmy Carter, in 2004 it went 60% for Bush, and in 2008 72% voted for McCain over Obama.
There is, of course, the first conclusion most people make by looking at that map, racism. An October 27th Washington Post article by Ruth Marcus, "In W.Va., Lingering Doubts on Obama" dealt with sentiments in the southwest corner of West Virginia, reddest in the above maps for politics and poverty. In Mingo County less than a century ago Mother Jones (the person, not the magazine) organized miners there in the "largest organized armed uprising in American labor history". In 1976, Carter carried three-quarters of the vote; Gore won 60% there in 2000, but Obama lost by a margin of 12%, the reverse of the 2004 results for that county. In 1984 when Ronald Reagan carried West Virginia by 11% in his 49-state win the county voted Democrats outnumber Republicans 11:1. The slip from 2000 to 2004 to 2008 is also a biproduct of the citizens being able to relate less and less to the Democratic nominees versus the Republican ticket and the frustration over the loss of the region's prefered candidate, Hillary Clinton. The article's 'man on the street' expressed concern over the possibility Obama is a 'secret Muslim', that "if Obama goes in there the [blacks] are going to go crazy," and that his values differed irreconsilably.

However, for some of the few places Democrats are losing ground, many are also losing population. The below map shows population loss in many of the areas corresponding to longer-term Republican gains. This map covers population changes from 1980-2000, most notably absent is the massive population loss caused by Hurricane Katrina in Southern Louisiana.
Identity, populism, and racism are not the only reasons for the dramatic shift in votes. As alluded to earlier, the traditionally democratic areas that turned more red in Appalachia are "Coal Country". While the Miner's union endorsed Obama, his comments that building coal power plants would bankrupt companies under his administration were exploited to their full extent by Palin at a rally in southern Ohio (McCain co-sponsored legislation which would implement the policy Obama was describing in his errant comments, Cap-and-Trade).

The above map overlays perfectly with all above mentioned sociological, economic, demographic, & political trends. Upland Southern culture, higher Scotch-Irish and lower African-American ratios than the South as a whole, highly Democratic, high poverty rate, high population loss, and coal, all correspond to significant gains by the Republican ticket in 2008 relative to previous presidential elections.
10 comments:
"Upland South culture, higher Scotch-Irish and lower African-American ratios than the South as a whole, highly Democratic, high poverty rate, high population loss, and coal, all correspond to significant gains by the Republican ticket in 2008 relative to previous presidential elections."
"High poverty rate" is seemingly the odd one out here, which makes it all the more interesting.
I'm just amazed how all those maps fit together so perfectly, the population loss less so than the others, but it's amazing how sharp the clearly defined the borders are.
This analysis isn't that deep, the red area of the lowest household incomes in the 5th map are in the coal region that is heavily Democratic and represented the largest Republican gains this year.
What's I'd like to learn more about is Eastern Tennessee, the little sliver to the east of Appalachian coal field boundary in the coal region map, it's the only region in the South that's been consistently Republican since the Civil War, an oddity anywhere for the Republican party.
Taylor - that's the Chattanooga-Knoxville-Tri-Cities corridor that follows I-75/40/81. The region was Unionist during the Civil War era, and strong loyalty to the Republican Party has persisted through the years. New Deal programs such as TVA have formed a developmental back bone in the region, and the region contains the Oak Ridge National Lab. Notable GOP favorite sons include Howard Baker and Lamar Alexander. The history of the region would suggest a certain political pragmatism, but the GOP has captured all support as a matter of course. I often wonder what it might take to create a greater degree of political diversity and competition in the region...are migratory inflows the only possible driver?
The "Yeoman" upland farmer owned few or no slaves compared to the Deep South: Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and North Carolina did not secede until after the Attack on Fort Sumter, while West Virginia, Missouri, Kentucky & Maryland remained in the Union during the Civil War.
fixed that 4 ya;-)
I would like too take some time out thank the posters for doing what you do and make this community great im a long time reader and first time poster so i just wanted to say thanks.
I just want too take some time too thank the posters for doing what you do and making the community what it is im a long time reader and first time poster so i just wanted to say thanks.
I would just like to take some time too Thank all the people for doing what you do and make this community great im a long time reader and first time poster so i just wanted to say thanks.
There is no οne waу will ωork for уou
the buѕіneѕs end-conѕumeг.
ӏn 1972, my busineѕs parents -- eveгyοne but myself.
First and foremοst, you need tο preѕent уour on ρaper.
Where to Gеt TraineԁAll this stuff is comрletеly uselesѕ
if you don't charge your potential sellers for these items. Always be willing to maintain a positive impression on your clients and executives. The concerns are real.
My web site :: new internet marketing
Post a Comment